Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museum Pachten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Museum Pachten

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to be a notable museum. Briefly mentioned in a local guidebook, and only newspaper coverage located appears to me local. No wider WP:AUD-compliant coverage located. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Germany. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dillingen, Saarland.--Jahaza (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure ?♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable enough museum, just needs further expansion.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. A small provincial museum that is mostly known for its collection of relics from Contiomagus, which is a notable topic all on its own. But now and then a newspaper discusses an exhibit, artifact, event or staff change. E.g., , , . The museum has been noted. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NEXIST Lightburst (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.