Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushroom Kingdom Fusion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nom. (NAC) // roux    04:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Mushroom Kingdom Fusion

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable game. It's a fangame that seems to read like one of doctor frankenstein's later experiments; you know, the ones after he bought the Xbox. Fails notability guidelines, delete and move on. Ironholds (talk) 02:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Withdrawn by Nom Ironholds (talk) 04:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This article should not be deleted because MKF is an important part of the internet. It has been featured on Go Nintendo, Mario Fan Game Galaxy, many blogs, Mobb, Gametrailers, and many more. Wikipedia is meant to provide information when you need to know something at the instant. So what is your first reaction when you want to know about this game that has just been featured somewhere? You search it on wiki.
 * Well personally if a game was featured on Gametrailers I'd be more likely to search there. And this game was referenced in west coast hip-hop? Wow! Is mario down with the hood, then? Ironholds (talk) 03:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't wikipedia suppose to cover everything? We have pages for fricken memes? And as a response to your first post
 * "And as a response to IronHold the game is actauly very well done, it has won many awards and the team working on it has ome impresive skills.
 * Here is one of the levels, level 4-4: Corpse of the Behemoth
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI-HLM7YYgo
 * The game is still in beta!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theusedslash07 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not meant to cover everything, no; if it was we wouldn't need to delete anything, would we? Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If it has won awards, link to them. Ironholds (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * http://mkfusion.ipbfree.com/index.php?showtopic=3527 Shows link to website and entries that it won —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theusedslash07 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Those awards don't qualify a game for inclusion, I'm afraid; the awards themselves are not notable. Ironholds (talk) 03:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Why exactly dose this article need to be deleted though? Just because it's a fan game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theusedslash07 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No, because it doesn't pass the notability guidelines found at WP:N. The fact that it is a fan game doesn't matter. Ironholds (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So if I can find some source that says that it is famous or holds importance then it could be an article, correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theusedslash07 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sources from notable websites (so not a forum/blog) and sources that give significant coverage, so not 1-line about how it exists. Ironholds (talk) 04:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * http://gonintendo.com/?p=65616

http://gonintendo.com/?p=52161

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/01/20/super-mario-fusion-makes-mushroom-kingdom-hearts-a-reality/

http://kotaku.com/346207/super-mario-fusion-a-happy-marriage-of-halo-and-mario

http://digg.com/nintendo/Super_Mario_Fusion_A_Happy_Marriage_of_Halo_and_Mario

http://digg.com/nintendo/Super_Mario_Fusion

http://www.supermariogames.biz/video/super-mario-fusion/

http://www.moddb.com/games/mushroom-kingdom-fusion/news

http://mkf.110mb.com/

Awards website

http://ncfc.taloncrossing.com/booths.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theusedslash07 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Accepted; include them in the article itself and we are done here. Ironholds (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok sorry for the mix up, how would I include these?


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.