Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Land


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Music Land

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced, original research Stonemason89 (talk) 18:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Silly Symphonies. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Musicland as a likely search term. Article is for NN cartoon with no indication of its standalone notability. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 05:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But Musicland is an entirely different subject. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Then maybe a disambig? Stonemason89 (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)




 * Keep as meeting WP:NF and further expand and source this piece of cinematic history. While it being released in 1935 and during the Great Depression may make sourcing perhaps difficult, its notability as groundbreaking in 1935 is not now disappeared simply because of its age.  As one of Walt Disney's early works, I would be incredibly surprised if this was not somewhere in our national archives, or if it were not included as part of various university and college courses in animation and cinema history. Time for more work, but not for deletion, redirection, or merging.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q.
 * Note Since offering my opinion, I have begun addressing the nomintor's concerns that the article was "unsourced, original research". It has now been edited, cleaned up, and sourced, and contains no original research.  This Walt Disney produced classic short from animation history now meets WP:NF and merits an article on Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Much better now, but some inline citations wouldn't hurt. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination. The rescue team has done a great job of cleaning up this article; it looks fine now and I don't see any problems with notability or other issues. So I am withdrawing my AFD nomination. Stonemason89 (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep after cleanup this article meets the notability criteria. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 17:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * keep looks fine to me thanks for some cleanup Arskwad (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.