Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music in the 21st Century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 21:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Music in the 21st Century
Listcruft. Delete. Andy Saunders 00:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Most critically acclaimed" is going to be very difficult to be NPOV. Furthermore, I don't see this being done for all 100 years in the 21st century; I think by decade is how it's done now. There's probably someplace this can be redirect to though. -R. fiend 00:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only way this is ever going to be objective is if it uses sales lists. And if that, it's just a list to be made sometime in the future. Last Avenue 01:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless as a list with no prose or explanation.--ragesoss 02:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The unsourced POV "most critical acclaim" sections obviously should be deleted. But surely there could be a general article on 21st century music? -- Astrokey44 |talk 04:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 12:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but remove "most critical acclaim" section. Dbinder 13:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as current articles seem to be of the form Timeline of trends in music (1990-1999), and Timeline of trends in music (2000-present) already exists. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 18:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.