Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Rajput clans of Rawalpindi Division


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Muslim Rajput clans of Rawalpindi Division

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just useless. Two identically sourced/formatted articles have recently been deleted at AfD - see
 * Articles_for_deletion/Jat_clans_of_Multan_Division and
 * Articles_for_deletion/Muslim_Jat_clans_of_Lahore_Division.

As I said then, what is the point of this, bearing in mind that the lead says "The appearance of a particular tribe as Jat Rajput in the list does not in itself confirm that the tribe is Jat Rajputs or otherwise. Identity may change with time, and some groups in the list may no longer identify themselves as Jats Rajputs." Also bear in mind that the 1911 census was not reliable, being subject to the huge misunderstandings resultant from the influence of H. H. Risley and other scientific racists. It's basically just a transcription of a primary source. I've struck out "Jat", as used in prior deletions, and replaced with "Rajput" as used in this article's lead. One past AfD was contested at WP:DRV but the outcome remained the same. Sitush (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete As either a non-notable stand-alone list with no significant topic coverage in reliable sources or a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization, or both. Philg88 ♦talk 05:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable list. – Davey 2010' •  (talk)  22:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.