Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim outrage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Muslim outrage

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was just restored by DRV after an improper speedy was overturned. Article fails WP:OR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NEO, WP:SYN, WP:NOTDICDEF, and WP:INFO. L0b0t (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. non-encyclopedic. An arbitrary word compination. No content beyond derived from separate words: Muslim and outrage. Mukadderat (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-- seems like a poorly written dicdef, and besides, it fails WP:DUH! L'Aquatique [review  ]  18:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a nonencyclopedic dicdef/OR. Lastingsmilledge (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. NN Dreamspy (talk) 20:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp  | talk to me  00:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the nomination says it all, really. :) Terraxos (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator's alphabet soup. Resolute 01:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICDEF. Debate   木  01:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm outraged that I cannot think of a clever response to top the nominator's be-all/end-all explanation! Ecoleetage (talk) 02:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This REALLY pisses me off!!! I get angry every time I think about it. Abdul Mohammed Hussein al-Mandsfordi (talk) 15:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Every time I see this article title I want to start singing The Sweet's "Teenage Rampage". Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLICY. Eklipse (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a self-evident definition of a common phrase. I have been unable to find independent sourcing of this as a unique topic.  Anything we could write on the topic would appear to violate WP:SYN.  Rossami (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.Bless sins (talk) 22:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.