Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustek Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Mustek Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:CORP. Only 3 hits in gnews. LibStar (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Taiwan. AllyD (talk) 05:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. After the proposed deletion template was added on 11 April 2023, I conducted searches for sources. I found sources about Mustek, a South African company founded by David Kan, a Taiwanese businessman, that sells personal computers. It has the website https://mustek.co.za and likely is notable. This is a different company from the Taiwanese manufacturing company Mustek Systems, which sells image scanners. It has the website https://www.mustek.com.tw/ and does not meet Notability (organizations and companies), which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. It's looking real grim on the web for this; while I dislike the idea of deleting a page about an equipment manufacturer (i.e. making it more difficult for people to use devices), it's not clear to me that they really have any products that are documented anywhere, meaning it is not possible for us to write a good (or indeed useful) encyclopedia article about them. Ping me if sources are found. jp×g 04:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.