Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muster (Texas A&M University)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Keep. The nominator is on a deletion/merging spree through articles related to Texas A&M University and needs to slow down and discuss these types of actions. Otherwise, it just wastes the time of a lot of editors. Johntex\talk 15:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Muster (Texas A&M University)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is one of a number of articles I found from the cleanup of the series of articles involving Texas A&M University. The series is comprehensive, and in a great amount of detail concerning all aspects of the University, whose article is already overlong, overlinked, and overladen with information of relevance only to alumni. As far as these articles are concerned, the traditions are already described in a sufficient level of detail for an encyclopaedia in Traditions of Texas A&M University, and I believe the minute detail contained in these nominated article sare in breach of WP:NOT. Ohconfucius 06:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You have GOT to be kidding. There are plenty of books and history to be shared here. While it is good information for alumni, it is also good for current students, prospective students, faculty, friends, family, and anyone else interested in these topics. There is no reason to wholesale delete a page just because you think "there is already enough information." There is also a lot more information that is NOT included in these pages because it is considered trivial, but if someone wants to know more about the yell leaders or muster or the history of gig 'em, what is the harm in putting it down in writing. BQZip01 07:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.