Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutant Pop Records (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Mutant Pop Records
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

unnotable single person operation. written like ad copy. ltb d l (talk) 07:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Oregon. ltb d l (talk) 07:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Can't find any significant coverage of the label. Some of the bands have coverage but notability is not inherited. Outside of a few blog posts mentioning it I can't find much else. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  17:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 00:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.