Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mute Crimson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Mute Crimson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Main concerns: no indication of importance; no notability (WP:N) and Notability (video games); no reliable sources (WP:IRS). Mephistophelian (talk) 18:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

I vote for a weak keep and a strong against your deletionist vendetta on this page. This is a stub that needs to be expanded, not destroyed. Every article needs to start somewhere, and I would ask MrSaturn to expand on it himself to solve both of your problems.Dkkicks (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Mephistophelian (talk) 18:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment—the trouble is that reliable sources on gaming, such as Gamespot, have entries with no content, reviews, imagery, comments, or links. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:GNG not satisfied, cannot find non-trivial mention in WP:RS. Notability (video games) is still a proposal, btw, failed once. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - no attention has been given to this game by reliable publications. Marasmusine (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete at least for now. Notability not established.  Hey, if it is later then maybe there will be some information to write about.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.