Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muthappa Rai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Muthappa Rai

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
 * Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
 * Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons Bharathiya 17:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Very notable enough as per this and this. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Just because some one is an ex-prisoner for multiple number of times doesn't necessarily qualify him to be in Wikipedia.
 * So I hereby strongly recommend deleting this article from immediate effect. DELETE Bharathiya 16:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharathiya (talk • contribs)


 * Keep: I do not see any reason why the article should not be present on wikipedia, the article needs improvement not deletion sarvajna (talk) 08:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is enough to get it's notability  →TSU tp* 15:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

* No trusted third party source. We cannot consider it as 'note-worthy' just because the name is there in 3 or 4 film story based news articles or jail release summary. Wiki needs trusted, verifiable third party source. Of course we may have respect or fear or something else for somebody but that does not mean that they should be in Wikipedia!!! Personally I may/can say keep but sorry to challenge its worthiness strictly as per wiki. Plz understand that Wikipedia has its own rules and we all have to abide by it to keep its standards. Provide 3-4 trusted, verifiable third party sources to maintain the Keep status in Wiki or else it should be deleted. DELETE  -- Bharathiya 02:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharathiya (talk • contribs) you have already made your point clear no need to repeat it sarvajna (talk) 04:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.