Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutual Assistance Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that this is a neologism. Davewild (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Mutual Assistance Living

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism, per WP:NEO. New editor, with good intentions, seeks to publicize a concept he invented and considers important. The primary sources are papers by the editor who created the article. Problems with WP:OR and WP:VAIN. Might be covered in some article on aging, but too new for a standalone article. See Talk:Mutual Assistance Living. John Nagle (talk) 04:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM more than OR or anything else. I don't really see good intentions when someone introduces a marketable concept as "new." Potatoswatter (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, acknowledge good faith on the part of the article creator, but still falls afoul of WP:NEO. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:NEO.--Berig (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:SPAM, and WP:NEO also Gary King ( talk )  19:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.