Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutual energy principle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Mutual energy principle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article Mutual energy principle in question should be entirely and summarily deleted. It is incoherent and idiosyncratic, and cannot be repaired piecemeal. It cannot be saved by saying 'Oh, it's just that the author is not fluent in English'. It mixes quantum and classical ideas as if they belonged to the same paradigm. It is more or less pure OR. This is currently obvious from its being a very long article that is the work of a sole author.Chjoaygame (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as basically exactly the kind of thing WP:NOR was invented to stop. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as unmitigated junk. Formally WP:OR. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:NOR. This looks awful.  I doubt a PhD would have an easy time sorting it out.  Appears to be the work of a singular author and sounds like a lecture.  A damning factor for this article is the fact that it has a conclusion and synthesizes the techno-babble from above.  Nope.  Jip Orlando (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Save The mutual energy principle is a theory combining the two important theories, one is Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory derived in 1945 and the time-domain reciprocity theorem from W. J. Welch derived in 1960. In the time Wheeler and Feynman writing the absorber theory, they do not know the  the time-domain reciprocity theorem. I believe if they know they will also introduced the mutual energy principle. Dr. Shuang-ren Zhao derived the mutual energy theorem in 1987. The mutual energy theorem and time domain reciprocity theorem can be seen as a same theorem but one is in the time domain and another one is in Fourier domain. This theorem tell us the part of energy send from a transmitting antenna to a receiving antenna. This theorem tell us the receiving antenna sends advanced wave similar to the absorber in Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory. 30 years after the derivation of the mutual energy theorem, Dr Shuang-ren Zhao finally realized that the mutual energy theorem actually can also describe the energy flow of the photon. This is a very important discovery. Hence it should offer some time to let this article fully develop, correct some English errors, make good formula and so on. The mutual energy principle is Wheeler and Feynman trying very hard to get but still not. However Wheeler and Feynman have introduced many concepts which have been included inside the theory of the mutual energy principle.Imrecons (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It's beyond me to evaluate whether there is actually some fundamental discovery here that will revolutionise the world of physics - but then again, that's not what Wikipedia is for. We don't publish novel ideas. After this principle/theory has been thoroughly digested, reviewed, verified by repeated experiments, and incorporated into generally accepted science - then it should have an article here.  At the moment it is OR. --Gronk Oz (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research - note absence of sources/references beyond very first paragraph. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - well, the real issue of course is WP:OR, and the refs make it clear this is a single-man or rather single-lab project. This being said, I scanned quickly through the contents, and while there are no outright calculations mistakes or other egregious stuff, this has a few hallmarks of WP:FRINGE (especially in the "conclusion" section) - I could develop if really needed, but I am not sure that is a worthwhile use of time here. Tigraan Click here to contact me 09:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not really sure from taking a look at the article what it's even about. Natureium (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Our existing articles on the topic are not fantastic, but the understandable half of the article in consideration is about Maxwell equations, more precisely solutions of the form of the retarded potential. The other half involves pretty much every concept of quantum physics, but I cannot parse it (it may be because of my limited knowledge of the stuff, but I doubt it). Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. --Steve (talk) 14:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. It's just original research, which is not what we publish. There's lots of peer-reviewed journals for that stuff. Bearian (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.