Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mx Takatak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to MX Player. (Policy-based arguments are given for redirection and there is a consensus in favor of this outcome; notice that relisting does not have to be done for the full seven days per WP:RELIST). (non-admin closure) — Bilorv ( talk ) 01:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Mx Takatak

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not Passing GNG, sources are unreliable or routine coverage. Sonofstar (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The article currently lists extraordinarily significant sources from The Economic Times. There are so many hits on Google news. This seems to be a frivolous nomination much like Articles for deletion/Moj (app) Mottezen (talk) 00:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - Analysing the references one by one. The first reference is an Apple Store link that can't be counted as a source. The second is a google playstore link. Entrackr doesn't seem to be a very reliable source. Seems very niche with most of its news about funding etc (likely to be rewritten from various press releases without fact checks. I might be wrong though but quick browsing of their website does give this perception). The Economic Times link doesn't seem to be independent. There is no byline. The way it is written, no journalist would write that way.  Another ET link which doesn't seem very independent and likely to be influenced. Besides, it is funding related news that doesn't help much to contribute notability. And last  is an Indian television website link. Seems obviously promotional. Doesn't qualify GNG and NCORP. I fail to understand why would an experienced editor would vote a strong keep at this junk of sources! Sonofstar (talk) 11:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's clear to me you don't understand WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Mottezen (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to MX Player. Would've suggested merge but the content on the parent company page is identical. -KH-1 (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to MX Player per WP:PRODUCT.---Pontificalibus 13:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to MX Player per WP:PRODUCT appears a valid option, otherwise Delete.  HighKing++ 15:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.