Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyFavoriteReview


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 08:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

MyFavoriteReview

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Run of the mill review website, non-notable. Buggie111 (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete – In addition to being non-notable, the references listed (such as they are) are of the "general interest/personal opinion blog" genre and not proper sources to substantiate anything. Senator2029 (talk) 02:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom GabrielF (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment from the talk page copied here for inclusion in the record. Senator2029 (talk) 03:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. There's just nothing out there to show that this is a notable site. There's no reliable sources proving notability. Also, Wikipedia is not a soapbox and we cannot keep a page just to "stick it" to the bigger review sites. Believe it or not, Rotten Tomatoes started off as a project by one person and was a "little guy" at one point in time. The only reason they got big was because they got lucky when someone reported on them. Wikipedia is not to be used as a way to promote your site. There is no personal vendetta against your site and we're not here to promote anyone. The site just does not have notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for promoting site. (and a note for whoever wrote that article: you made a valid point right there but unfortunately Wikipedia is not a cross section of society. Yep you are right, it is basically only for famous or in other words notable subjects).Trongphu (talk) 04:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.