Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyHound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

MyHound

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There are sources, but it is unclear that they are significant enough to demonstrate notability. FisherQueen (Talk) 15:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Multiple pages. This AfD also includes the redirects My Hound Media, Myhound and Myhound media. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Like mentioned before, MyHound is notable because it is the first centralized alert system for the entertainment industry. Various sources, including well-respected blogs and online tech portals (not to mention Newsweek!) lend credibility to this claim. These sources exactly fit the criteria for this article to be "notable." Admittedly it is not a very large firm yet, but this is not to the detriment of its importance as the creator of an original online concept, and thus its inclusion in Wikipedia is more than justified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JDB6000 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC) — JDB6000 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete unless better sources can be found - the Newsweek article referenced is a one sentence mention, Google News brings up nothing of relevance, the first few pages of ordinary Google hits consist mostly of press releases, blogs and forums. No sign that this passes WP:WEB Iain99 16:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 16:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:N. Bravedog 17:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Another source that proves it is getting more and more attention: http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/startups-to-wat.html (from the Silicon Alley Insider). — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDB6000 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment That's a two sentence mention. But two short sentences. Sorry, this is still a long way from "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself". Iain99 20:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all, not notable. Realkyhick 19:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable. Djmckee1  -  Talk - Sign  21:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.