Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyProLang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 00:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

MyProLang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of this article generates 10 hits when I do a English langauge Google search. This is not dispositive, but reasonable evidence that there is not much in the way of significant coverage. The fact that the project was the subject of a poster presentation at ICSSA 2008 is not helpful, as (a) a poster presentation does not constitute significant coverage, and (b) even if it did, the poster was presented by a creator of the project, hence not independent:


 * Dr. Aziz Barbar, Chairperson of the Department of Computer Science, will be representing AUST in the United States on October 22nd, during the International Conference on Computer Science and Applications (ICCSA), San Francisco. The research paper is entitled: MyProLang – A Template-Driven Automatic Natural Programming Language, and was written by Dr. Aziz Barbar and Youssef Bassil (graduate student).
 * —AUST Midweek, p. 4

In addition, the article is created by a user whose username is identical to the creator of the subject software project, whose main contributions are on this article, and whose other contributions are only on closely related topics. Bongo matic  11:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - we've been through all this before with other grad students publishing their theories online. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Maralia (talk) 04:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.