Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyWebFace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

MyWebFace

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is not an encyclopedia article -- it is an advertisement for a freeware program, complete with how-to instructions. Two attempts to Speedy Delete the article were rejected (incorrectly, IMHO). A wishy-washy Prod tag was put in place, but I thought we could use more eyes on this to confirm its lack of notability. A Google News search only turns up a self-promoting press release:. Warrah (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree, this reads as though it were a brochure from the software's creator, with instructions and trivia like the privacy policy, which really isn't even about the software. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB, WP:V. Given the part about the privacy policy it seems pretty likely this is intended as an advertisement. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, db-web. Woogee (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, quite like an advertisement really, but after the privacy policy part is deleted it seems better than before.--219.79.1.245 (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't really think this article should be deleted, at least it provides information such as age requirements of the software.--Tingo Chu (talk) 08:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes this software notable? Woogee (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Half of the article is an advertisement talking directly to the reader. No indication of notability. Eik Corell (talk) 23:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Which part in particular?--Tingo Chu (talk) 09:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't find any sources to indicate that this is notable. And for a moment I thought it looked pretty cool, until I found out it's a browser toolbar you have to install.  I can't imagine what sort of spyware features it must be loaded down with.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 00:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.