Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Beautiful Robe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Skillet (album). Mz7 (talk) 04:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

My Beautiful Robe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails any notability criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  19:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  19:53, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  19:53, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Skillet or the album per ATD-R. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  19:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * In no way is it a suitable or likely search term. The song was released a decade ago and has never merited an article or creation of an article. The creator is simply trying to create empty articles about two specific bands. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Generally being a single and not having any convoluted disambigustion is considered enough to be a plausible search term. Sergecross73   msg me  01:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 *  Move to My Beautiful Robe (Skillet song) and then redirect to Skillet (album) - Song is mentioned on the tracklisting so makes sense to redirect there. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Why would you move it there when there's nothing else at My Beautiful Robe or My Beautiful Robe (song). There's no need for any disambiguation at all, let alone that. Sergecross73   msg me  03:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Because I clearly thought there was more than one title? ....... I thought that would've been obvious but apparently not!.... – Davey 2010 Talk 03:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. You sound upset with me over the fact that you proposed a page move without any particular rationale or research into why such a proposal would be necessary? But why would you suggest alternate naming like that without even checking to see if there are things at other locations? That's the whole reason we add disambiguation. Sergecross73   msg me  12:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope I can assure you I'm not upset ..... Not sure why I would be ?, I've already answered your question shan't be repeating myself. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies then. I'm not trying to be difficult or badgering, your reaction just left me confused. You sort of left 2 aproaches in your original comment, and then after I left my comment, you deleted the one that coincided with my stance and left a response that your intentions should have been obvious. Wasn't sure how to interpret that... Sergecross73   msg me  13:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I suppose I was annoyed with the way you replied, As I said I simply assumed which looking back I shouldn't of done, Anyway apologies for the rattled response, Anyway all water under the bridge :), The last comment was for me to copy and paste and it should've been removed before saving, ANyway thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect - per my comments above. Additionally, per WP:AT, no page move should occur. It's already at its correct location. Sergecross73   msg me  12:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Album - See my reasoning at Articles for deletion/Gasoline (Skillet song). ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.