Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Brother, Borat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep, I can tell which way the WP:SNOW is blowing. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

My Brother, Borat

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Film that's still in production, mentioned in a single news article. Doesn't seem notable enough; also, see WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * KEEP according to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11811933 the film has been made and is awaiting release. A cursory google search also generates a full page of news results from differing sources (bbc/NY times etc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carl Sixsmith  (talk • contribs)  18:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, lots of reliable coverage. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Much coverage and love in the mainstream press.  This is a sequel to a famous movie. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep With respects to the nominator, as the film has been completed, is covered in multiple reliable sources, and is simply awaiting release, an article about the film is specifically encouraged by both policy and guideline. See Time Magazine New York Times Observer Cinema Blend  BBC News  et al   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And since opining above, I have expanded and sourced the article. More to do yes... but no longer quite the stub that was first nominated.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NFILM. Film has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and principal photography has begun. Uncle Dick (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Film has reliable sources. --Monterey Bay (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be reliably sourced. -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! &lrm; 08:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Film has drawn international media coverage, hence is notable. Since the articles expansion and referencing by User:MichaelQSchmidt its content appears to be reliable.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.