Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My GRAIN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as a repost after an AfD closed only a few days ago. Recreating the article with a slightly different title is not the right solution, and declining a speedy and restarting an AfD is even less correct. Take it to WP:DRV if you have any procedural objections.Fram 18:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

My GRAIN

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was deleted before at Articles for deletion/MyGRAIN. Was reposted and deleted as repost. Speedy declined today as meeting assertion of notability. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  16:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep They need to be kept. Last time they were deleted for a bad reason. No harm can come from keeping them. The only thing that could be changed is that the name of the band is myGRAIN, not My GRAIN.Morspecs911 16:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Being harmless is not a reason to keep an article. --Dhartung | Talk 18:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC, 1 album doesn't cut it, and nothing has changed in the last few days since this was deleted. Should have been speedied under G4. But since it keeps coming back, blocking recreation may be in order here. Carlossuarez46 16:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep So they shouldn't be able to have a wikipedia page because they haven't had a secound album yet? Morspecs911 17:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This is not about "having a wikipedia page". This is no Facebook. This is an encyclopedia, with very precise criteria about admitting an article (not a "page") on a subject. --Goochelaar 17:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * So they can't have an article in a free encyclopedia because they only have one album, and people don't think they are notable? 71.114.32.227 18:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been discussed over and over. If the article doesn't meet the criteria at WP:MUSIC, then no, they can't "have" an article.  Oli Filth 18:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This is not a "free encyclopedia" in the sense that "it's free for anyone to have a page". They fail our guidelines for the inclusion of musical groups and artists. They only have one album, which is insufficient for criterion 5. --Dhartung | Talk 18:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep & Rename Sufficiently notable for a band. --Djsasso 17:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * How? There is nothing that I can see on the article page that meets the criteria at WP:MUSIC. Oli Filth 17:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete seems like easy case - non-notable. If and when they become notable, a new page can be created. 17:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkBul (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete and salt per CSD G4 - the article was previously AfD'd as MyGRAIN, and subsequently speedied twice. Author has made no attempt to address WP:MUSIC, even after repeated prompting on Talk:MyGRAIN.  Quite probable use of socks to remove speedy tags as well.  Oli Filth 17:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any claim to notability, not even in their website, apart from they giving some gig and some song being aired by some non-notable radio. --Goochelaar 17:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnotable, fails WP:MUSIC. Salt seems advised. --Dhartung | Talk 18:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article cannot justify its noteability in my opinion, further to the sparse website, therefore delete. If the band suddenly become the next beatles the page can always be re-creates. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 18:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.