Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Health Shop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Biblio worm  01:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

My Health Shop

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Only claims of corporate notability are number of twitter followers (and claiming that value as evidence of "fastest growing" as a company itself is hopeless nonsense). DMacks (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Removed reference to fastest growing as DMacks states, although company can still be notable in that many thousands of people follow it. Wikipedia states "Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject" a measure of popularity can be Twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcoop814 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no indication of notability. (7000 twitter followers can easily be purchased). . . .Mean as custard (talk) 21:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong (if not speedy) delete. Retail company without significant, substantial coverage in secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - that was why I put there in the first place. It would have been stronger if this business doesn't appear to be gaining any prominence anywhere (hence the reason I did not request deletion initially). &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - when I saw the "possible vandalism" tag beside the entry for page's creation in the page history, I knew this might be a problem, for until now I have never seen a new page creation tagged as such.


 * Delete Notability needs to come from WP:RS which are lacking and don't seem to exist. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG --Jersey92 (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Legacypac (talk) 07:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.