Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Jet Xpress Airlines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While this would appear to be a no consensus by the numbers, the strength of !votes clearly tips this to delete as those have policy on their side. Those arguing this could be solved editorially have not provided policy based reasons to keep it. If someone believes there's significant Malaysian sourcing, I' happy to provide in draft. Star  Mississippi  01:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

My Jet Xpress Airlines

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

the managing director of a Malaysian aviation startup came on live chat and wanted to know why his company couldn't have an article, when inadequately-sourced articles like this one exist. He's right - I checked, and I don't think this one meets notability criteria. The sources cited are primary. I'm loath to delete it based solely on the complaints of a competitor, though.

Also, the company's been around for 50 years, so maybe I'm just not using the optimal search terms or looking in the right places. DS (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Aviation,  and Malaysia. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep an airline that operates a Boeing 737 size aircraft is of note, deletion is not a cure for badly referenced article it just needs some work. MilborneOne (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep GNews has a few good hits in Transportation media/publications, this one for example. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * and a few other sources in Malaysian media, in Malay? and Chinese it looks like. I think we have notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a press release - same as this one on the Kerry website which is marked as PR. Fails WP:ORGIND.  HighKing++ 11:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense to suggest that a company that operates a Boeing 737 is notable - there's nothing in our guidelines to suggest that forms part of the criteria. This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. There are particular criteria for establishing the notability of a company which must be met by appropriate references and this article has no references that come close. I'm not an expert in searching for Malaysian sources though but my attempts came up empty - its all very well wishing that better sources exist but we also can't assume that they do for sure exist. Finally, references that are based on company announcements and press releases fails ORGIND and do not assist in establishing notability. As it stands, this topic fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Just Need Some Works To The Article Emery Cool21 (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to be the one who does that work. DS (talk) 12:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It shouldn’t be necessary for someone who votes to keep an article to edit it. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NCOMPANY. Operating B737 or whatever is not a free pass allowing the company to have a catalogue-entry that fails GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The topic/company appears to be of note and the article could be edited and reworked.Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "appears to be of note" - where?
 * Edited and reworked: sure. Are you volunteering to do so? DS (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Not my job or required of someone who votes to keep an article. Based on the article itself, I think the company is notable and someone else can improve or expand it. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.