Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Last Day (animated short)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 01:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

My Last Day (animated short)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 12:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - 1) Not sure this is a "film," and therefore not even sure WP:NF applies.  On the other hand, I'm not sure its "anime" either, since it was written by and for non-Japanese peoples.  2)  Whatever it is, its sourced. 12.249.243.118 (talk) 13:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:N, let alone WP:NF. Having a reference to the Youtube page isn't enough.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * And the other two references...? 12.249.243.118 (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - It was reviewed by THEM Anime Reviews, which is a reliable source. While normally I wouldn't say keep for just one source, the general lack of reliable reviews for anime (outside of Anime News Network) means we could need some leeway for the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I see enough references to pass WP:N, the referenced info just needs to be placed and cited in the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - the reviews are pretty routine coverage, but I guess Christian church-sponsored anime is a bit pioneering. 1292simon (talk) 13:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - found a summary by a UK magazine that might be of use. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't usually deal with film, so I'm not that familiar with the notability rules.  However, a quick look at WP:NF convinces me that the references cited here (not all of them; I agree the YouTube link, as self-published, doesn't count for much) are sufficient to qualify.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.