Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony Live: The World's Biggest Tea Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

My Little Pony Live: The World's Biggest Tea Party

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable MLP musical. Mythpage88 (talk) 02:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There is a source and you totally taking this too seriously on one page because you think it's not notable. Do some research for once.--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 02:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "A source" is not enough to meet even GNG. Additionally, if WP:LOTSOFSOURCES isn't a reason to vote keep, why would only one source be one? You're gonna have to do more than just say that it's notable in order for that to fly. Mythpage88 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "WP:LOTSOFSOURCES" is part of an opinion essay, not part of policy doctrine. Carrite (talk) 04:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, it's a widely-accepted one, frequently cited and applied in deletion discussions. Mythpage88 (talk) 04:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think that grownup males into "My Little Pony" make pedobear smile, that's what I think. I'm gonna just Assume Bad Faith on those weirdos... That shouldn't matter though. There are a MASSIVE number of Google hits for "My Little Pony" + tea party. I'll be damned if I'm gonna spend five minutes sussing them out, but it's pretty clear that an iceberg that big is gonna generate enough shavings for a Reliable Sources snowcone... MLP is creepy, but this one passes muster. Carrite (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 04:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - See WP:GOOGLEHITS for why this is not usually an accepted argument. Mythpage88 (talk) 03:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand. But in an ideal world, one running a proper WP:BEFORE would make such arguments unnecessary, since the massive number of G-Hits would indicate to the nominator that it was a Needs More Sources tagging problem rather than a Sources Do Not Exist problem. This one is pretty obvious with a quick Google search, it seems to me... Carrite (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ...Or that unreliable sources mention it, or that the search is picking up irrelevant results, etc. Mythpage88 (talk) 04:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I always want to stress to people that if you want something to be kept, do the work yourself. Never assume that someone else will end up doing the legwork. (In this case I did, but I could have easily walked away and did nothing.) If you do nothing, then don't be surprised if nobody else does and the article gets deleted because no sources were presented on the page.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I agree completely. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I've no doubt this is every bit as bad as the article hints that it is, but it was a big enough deal to run for years, play huge venues like Madison Square Garden, and get covered in reliable sources (example source: link ) Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, cause you know, it needs to be well, cooler. It needs to be about 20% cooler. (sorry, just had to) Sourcing is weak, but it looks like it can be expanded. ViperSnake151   Talk  05:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm trying to do a rescue on this right now and I'm finding more than a few reviews of the DVD out there from staff reviewers and the like. I'm going to refrain from voting until I'm done, but there does seem to be some sources out there.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Keep. I found some reliable reviews of the DVD and there seems to be more out there. If not for about 6-10 pages of notes that need to be typed up, I'd still be searching for sources. I want to note that for anyone looking for sources, you will want to search "My Little Pony Live" separately from the rest of the title.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.