Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony terminology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

My Little Pony terminology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Excessive detail that is not needed for Wikipedia. The sort of page that you'd see on a fan wiki. The plot, characters, setting and other sections of individual pages are more than enough to explain these terms. Thus the page is not needed. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment This appears to be an ill-named "World of ..." article, of which Wikipedia has dozens if not hundreds of articles: Special:PrefixIndex/World of. These kinds of articles are to succinctly bundle in-universe information in list form so that they aren't fancrufty stand-alone articles. (No advice on keeping or deleting this one from me.) – sgeureka t•c 08:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Harizotoh9,you're always notorious on complaining at things like this and want them removed as an eyesore.Just leave it alone!--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't a product guide nor a dictionary. This content doesn't seem to meet independent, reliable sources for WP:GNG and it seems too trivial to keep a page like this as it apparently is not important concept of the series, which IAR may be warrantied (to avoid this stuff to get their own pages). Secret account 05:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Tell that to Transformers. I mean they got their separate articles on EVERYTHING! WHY.NOT.THIS?? All of the people here marking my articles as delete gives me a bad mood everyday!--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid in a deletion debate. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Full disclosure: I'm a brony. Weakest keep possible, I believe that most, if not all of this, is relevant, but I would tentatively support a move to "World of..." as suggested by Sgeureka. Also, a lot of this is duplicated, or could be duplicated, by articles we already have on ponies. Specs112   t   c  19:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, unencyclopedic cruft. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A lot of details but nothng to show subject list is notable. --Artene50 (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep My Little Pony fandom is a major cultural phenomenon with a vast number of products, which has produced whole books, some of which are unauthorised (i.e. independent) and produced for adults, which could be used to source this article. There are also websites and newspaper articles (try googling).  This article should be kept as a spin-off of My Little Pony, although a rename to "World of..." or something else wouldn't interfere with this, and is fine if it's considered to be policy/standard practice.  My Little Pony fandom may not have the respect attached to Marvel comics or Star Trek, but it's still the subject of significant independent publications. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:CONTENTFORK of the main series article. Sources about the main series don't justify multiple separate articles of a general nature. It's nearly impossible to WP:VERIFYNOTABILITY about the terminology or universe, as separate from the series itself. And in any case, it hasn't been achieved here, so no separate article can meet our guidelines. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't Care.Blackgaia02 (Talk if you&#39;re Worthy) (talk) 02:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.