Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Maryanne: Chronicles of the Mundane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. I'm very concerned at some of the allegations in the articles the creator has made, as there's a large focus on various accusations and some of the content gives off the impression that they're using Wikipedia as a vehicle to respond to said allegations. Even if the book and author were notable, which they aren't, this would still violate a lot of Wikipedia's guidelines because of how they were written and because they're completely unsourced. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: I have now blocked the user for the pages, as it seems clear that this was intentional mischief and likely a way to harass another person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

My Maryanne: Chronicles of the Mundane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book with no claim of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete: not even close to notable. Dschslava (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nowhere near notable, also written by the author of the book, who has been making many promotion pieces. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm going to shut this down early. There's little chance of this passing NBOOK even if we wait a full week, but what concerns me is that the article also makes allusions about someone accusing the author of harassment. That makes this particularly troublesome because while this isn't a biography of a living person, making statements of that nature aren't really kosher on Wikipedia - even if the person is only claiming that the accusations have occurred. This, paired with some of the content that the author wrote in another article (which was turnd into a redirect) give off the impression that the author might be using Wikipedia as an outlet to get to his accuser. This might not be the case, but it's strong enough to where I'm going to close all of this down early and delete the various articles the author has made. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.