Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Meebas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Mattel toys. No sourced content in the article so nothing mergeable. Jenks24 (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

My Meebas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

These toys seem to have gone completely unnoticed by the press and the bookpublishing industry: zero reliable sources to be found that discuss the topic; delete per GNG. Drmies (talk) 04:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - I copied this article to Wikialpka for backup in case it gets deleted here. Enjoy! Mathewignash (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  00:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge - Delete - These were toys that were on the market for only a year or two (2008/9) and they apparently were not a success. As mentioned above, virtually no sources refer to them.  I cannot find a List of Mattel toys  article to merge it into, unfortunately. --Noleander (talk) 05:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yikes ... how did I not see List of Mattel toys.   It does indeed exist, so a merge is appropriate. --Noleander (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to List of Mattel toys, the only reliable source I found was this reuters article, and we need more than one source to establish notability. These toys seem to have attracted a devoted following, however. --Cerebellum (talk) 21:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.