Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Mommy Manual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

My Mommy Manual

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Private company, first off. Secondly, of the sources listed, one seems to be a local area magazine, and the other is just a mention. Most of the external links listed are Twitter, and this Google search bring up very few hits that seem reliable. Whose Your Guy (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable at all. LiteralKa (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, no coverage of the company in reliable sources. The KMVO news story identifies Ria Sharon as from My Mommy Manual but does not discuss the company. Likewise, Likewise, the St. Louis Woman Magazine story is about Sharon, not the company. —C.Fred (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and article is fundamentally promotional -Drdisque (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage found.  — fetch ·  comms   18:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comment. Non notable company. Ooopsy for slipping through speedy. Bhockey10 (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.