Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Nah Nah Nah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

My Nah Nah Nah

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Individual episodes are not notable unless somehow special Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 18:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, no external sources. --LK (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete, ever other 160 episodes have been documented. It would be ridiculous not to document this one. Page has external sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciaran119 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * comment- looks like the page has been updated with some external sources, which might help indicate some notability. Umbralcorax (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF -- Just because otherstuff exists doesn't mean that this should. Perhaps every other episode shouldn't be documented. What makes each individual episode notable? Many shows have pages with summaries of a number of episodes at a time - Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 21:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not all scrubs episodes have been documented. Check List of Scrubs episodes, perhaps this is better suited to a summary section in this article unless notability for this episode on its own can be established -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 21:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: non-notable episode, nothing exceptional. JamesBurns (talk) 02:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Reception section shows this episode has been talked about in third party sources. Million_Moments (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. No policy requires topics to be "somehow special", only that they be verifiable in third-party sources, which this episode is. DHowell (talk) 04:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nomination reason is not consistent with deletion criteria. Independent 3rd party sources are provided, indicating notability. Rlendog (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This episode was covered by independent sources. --J.Mundo (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep 3rd party sources and real-world content are included-- Jac 16888 Talk 22:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.