Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Sister the Vampire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

My Sister the Vampire

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:NN book series failing WP:NBOOK. Unable to find any indication this series meets any of WP:BKCRIT.

The following books in this series are nominated to be deleted with this series:
 * Revamped!
 * Switched (book)

Toddst1 (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * These are other, closely related articles:
 * Olivia Abbott
 * Sienna Mercer
 * Chris857 (talk) 00:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. The first thing I noticed is that the character page is almost entirely a copyvio from this site . I'm going to investigate to see if any of the others are the same.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep. Both of the book pages had copyvio issues of one sort or another.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all. I did a search and while this does have a fan following enough for one such fan to paste copyvio over almost all of the articles, all I could find for the book series was one review by Publishers Weekly. There's some non-usable blog reviews, but that's about it. You could also lump the author in with the pages to be deleted, as a search for her name doesn't bring up any sources that show notability either. It's popular, but as far as Wikipedia is concerned there's no notability for any of these pages.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I've posted a speedy template on the author page since it didn't seem to have been included in this AfD. If it's not speedied then I'll create an AfD for it myself, but hopefully I won't have to do that. I feel bad whenever I have to do stuff like this. I'd much rather keep stuff, but guidelines are guidelines.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Even compared to other books for children, there's very little coverage (even on blogs, etc). I don't think the series or author or books are notable. And the Publishers Weekly review wasn't high praise. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all three. No attempt made to provide any references. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.