Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Starbucks Rewards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

My Starbucks Rewards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable program, possibly advertising Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Starbucks or just to loyalty card. This is already mentioned on the main article for Starbucks and I don't see where it really needs a separate article of its own. At most it might be worth redirecting to just plain loyalty card since the general premise is there.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Starbucks per Tokyogirl. This article looks more like advertising for Starbucks than an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Could someone please quote where it is even mentioned in Starbucks? Because a lookthrough and a ctrl+F found no mentions of the rewards program, "card rewards" or simply "rewards" anywhere in the article. I don't think it should be a redirect to a page that doesn't provide the information. If someone wants to add all this into the Starbucks article then fine, but I believe that it's almost a bit too complicated to be fit into the article in a way that wouldn't make people wonder why it didn't have its own article. gwickwire (talktome) (contribs!) 18:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Very slight merge to Starbucks. I understand your point that the rewards program is not mentioned in the main Starbucks article, but I don't think anything needs to be said about it there beyond "Starbucks has a loyalty card program called My Starbucks Rewards". If people want to know the details about the rewards program, they would be much better off looking at the Starbucks web site than expecting to find the details here in Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It is mentioned, but only a brief sentence as a loyalty card. [Starbucks#Recent_changes] It's in the third or fourth paragraph in this section. Really, that brief sentence is all that's really needed.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Delete because there's nothing in this article that's not available on the Starbucks website. The only references are to two blogs and the Starbucks website itself. – Majora4  (leave a message)   05:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Starbucks - Not enough in-depth coverage to justify a separate article (see wp:gng). Chris  (talk &#124; contribs) 00:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Ido not think there need be even a redirect, because this is not really a likely search term--anyone looking for information would look for the Startbucks article--or their web site. We shouldn;'t encourage this sort of article by routinely making a redirect.  DGG ( talk ) 21:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.