Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Vision: Challenges in the Race for Excellence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum. Consensus is that the topic is notable/encyclopedic, but that there is nothing of encyclopedic value here to preserve. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

My Vision: Challenges in the Race for Excellence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems to have been obviously created by a COI or Paid editor - author is obviously notable but can't find evidence of coverage of this vanity publication in independent reliable sources (emphasis on the independent). AlasdairEdits (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum: The present article text appears to be extruded from a machine-translation which has delivered chunks of incoherence: "Has been to rely in the formulation of article on cohabitation daily for development of international standards world"; "The book began with an introduction and the scarcity of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid"; "The Department of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid his book into five parts, issued provided". These would suggest WP:TNT even if the book had achieved specific notability. In the absence of evidence that it has, a redirect to the article about its author, which does list the book, may be appropriate. AllyD (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. There is some good RS out there. For example, this is a review of the book: . However, the article would have to be entirely re-written to be encyclopedic and coherent. Unless someone wants to start completely over and produce a proper article, deletion is the best answer.4meter4 (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.