Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My mhealth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

My mhealth
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I believe this page is one of many articles created by a paid editor. It does not pass WP:CORP and has been ref-bombed. Skirts89 (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I created this article. Nobody paid me.  I have no conflict of interest. There are 7 independent sources for the article.  The NHS has invested public money in the company. Rathfelder (talk) 19:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - The "7 independent sources" are of questionable validity, since they seem to be paid PR pieces. It does not matter if the NHS has invested in these companies, that does not indicate WP:GNG. Skirts89 (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So have you any evidence to suggest any of these sources, which include a government site, were paid? Rathfelder (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - As the nominator, I stand by my initial thought process - this fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Skirts89 (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails WP:NCORP. -The Gnome (talk) 09:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NCORP.  The sources are either not independent, routine business announcements, or just passing mentions.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.