Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mygodshot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Mygodshot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable project and future publication. No coverage anywhere that I can find and only claim in article is a member receiving an award. Fails WP:GNG. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a new project. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from one participant having previously received an award for a piece of design work (and the Bronze A' Design Award for Graphics and Visual Communication Design does not appear notable in itself anyway). My searches are finding social media but no reliable 3rd party coverage of this venture. At best, WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article's creator (who appears to have a COI) has stated that there are print sources available, however we would need to see them in order to see if they are independent and in-depth reliable sources. WP:PRIMARY sources (things released by the publication and/or people/organizations related to it) and WP:TRIVIAL sources (one line or very short mentions of the project in passing) cannot show notability for the paper and given the complete lack of coverage for the project I have to assume that most or all of the coverage is either primary or trivial. Once this publishes and it gains the necessary RS it can be recreated, but not before then. Something I have to warn the article creator about (since they appear to have created this in all good faith) is that routine notifications and database type listings do not show notability, as it only shows that the publication exists in one form or another, which is not a sign of notability in and of itself. I'd recommend that if they're interested, that they work on a copy of this at WP:AfC in the meantime and I have no problem with this being sent to the AfC draftspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The only source provided doesn't mention the subject. Fails WP:GNG Mduvekot (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with nom/Tokyogirl79. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.