Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myprojectfodebate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Myprojectfodebate
Page used to store an essay for a project. Nwwaew 18:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, per prod, (my) prod2 and afd. By the end of this debate it shall be clear that 1. The status quo is prohibiting academic freedom and 2. The status quo leaves gaps. (WP:NOT - No original research (#1), personal essays (#4), WP:NOR - No original research, WP:V - Verifiability, WP:RS - Reliable sources, etc). Article title is blatant as well. However, I believe prod'ing was fine, as by the time the prod ends, the deletion debate will still be open (unless closed earlier). -- ReyBrujo 19:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Wouldn't a speedy delete be more appropriate here? JASpencer 20:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no applicable speedy clause for these kind of articles. -- ReyBrujo 20:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe someone could look into that- who knows how many items have been uploaded to Wikipedia to store online. Nwwaew 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not Notepad. --Wafulz 21:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:V, what else?  ColourBurst 00:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per Wafulz. Wikipedia isn't meant as a convenient storage space for school essays. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 00:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.