Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myra Louise Taylor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 02:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Myra Louise Taylor

 * Delete Non notable person. Mostly red links on page. Of no intereset to anyone--Light current 23:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The red links can be removed, as they are fodder for future articles. She would be considered very interesting to the people of Newfoundland for her contribution to society. HJKeats 00:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, redlinks mean we need more articles, not that the subject is not notable. And she does appear notable. KillerChihuahua?!? 01:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Monicasdude 02:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, if what the article claims is true, she definitly is notable. pm_shef 18:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: This deletion debate was improperly closed early by NTK. I have reopened it so that it can take its five-day course. Stifle (talk) 22:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable. Skeezix1000 23:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Has done nothing more than at least one person in every city in the world has done; was a leader at a hospital, nothing more. Harr o 5 05:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Has anybody seen confirmation of the information?  The external link  doesn't seem to have any info on Taylor.  Maybe I'm not looking the right spot.  Google brings up only Wiki mirrors for me.  Of course, info on such a person may not be in Google (which is fine), but some sort of source needs to be mentioned (paper is fine, as long as they're stated).  This is the only reason for me not voting keep.  I don't doubt its true, but just want sources. --Rob 07:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this person is notable, and the article now has appropriate references. --Rob 22:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The text makes a pretty solid claim to notability, and is now referenced.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Nom did not do research. Redlinks can be removed. Faulty AfD. -- cmh 02:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. One or two of the redlinks are debatable; the rest merit and will eventually someday get articles. Samaritan 15:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep  M o e   ε  18:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.