Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myriad Search (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 02:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Myriad Search
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rather dated article, I can't find any evidence that this search engine still exists to this day. (I don't even remember reading about this) No references either-has been just laying around for 9 and half years! Wgolf (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Can't find any reliable, independent sources, just blogs and marketing sites.  Defunct now, and was it doesn't seem like it was talked about outside of the SEO field in the first place. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources in an article about a defunct website, not notable. Citation request from 2013 is telling. AlbinoFerret  16:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:WEBCRIT. Source examples include: ,. Another option is to merge to List of search engines. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sources :


 * -that is actually a good idea-the merge option. I was trying to find info earlier but only could find a couple blogs and wiki mirror pages. Wgolf (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep, now that references have been added. A merge is not a good idea, since List of search engines only includes sites notable enough to have an article. If you look at its talk page archives, you'll see that they're full of declined requests to add information about search engines that don't have articles. - Eureka Lott 15:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  stole my cup  //  and beans  // 00:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep, this site meets the notability criteria and should be notable enough for an article. LethalFlower (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.