Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myrkul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. The Bushranger One ping only 02:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Myrkul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of Forgotten Realms through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. Though he appears in several different media, this character is not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to some fanboy site that would love this kind of trivia. as for Wikipedia, the subject of the article fails WP:GNG as none of the sources are independent of the company that holds the IP for the character and so the options here are to delete or merge if there is appropriate content and an appropriate target. Given that the suggested target is already bloated with only primary sourced material, a merge seems to be only moving all of the issues from this page to another. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Arguments above regarding independence of sourcing set the bar too high. Fact is, multiple separate companies have published material detailing this fictional element in multiple separate (although admittedly related) game systems. Jclemens (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * While the companies may be "separate" if you ignore the fact that one bought out the other, and the third produces its content under an official licensee agreement, the fact is that you have yet to actually point to the policy that says "D&D articles dont need to meet independent sourcing requirements that all other articles need to." --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  01:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Procedural close as redirect/merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. This article was one of a series of related articles initially merged to the above target by User:Neelix subsequent to discussion in October 2010;  the merge was reverted by an IP-only editor just over a year later.  This suggests tacit agreement that the redirect and merge was acceptable to the majority of editors associated with the wikiproject.  In my opinion, a return to the status quo would serve the encyclopedia better than a prolonged and potentially heated debate over each individual deity article. (Note: there are other similar article currently nominated for deletion; I will copy this !vote/recommendation to those affected as well.)Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge (after trimming) into List of Forgotten Realms deities or Delete, per TRPoD, NinjaRobotPirate, Vulcan's Forge. Only primary sources, fails WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.