Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myrmica ordinaria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Myrmica ordinaria
it is a personal attack against someone Teh tennisman 18:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible, this is a hoax/personal attack sort of thing, I would bet dollars to donuts. Edward Wakelin 18:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete That's what I figured. Speedy it ASAP. Teh tennisman 18:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I added a speedy delete tag to it, I hope I did it right. Edward Wakelin 19:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. The personal attack part is a result of vandalism. Check the article history. --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The current rationale for deletion is not justified. --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, what? Attack pages are always speedy delete rationales.  However, the attack was the result of a vandal's edit, the attack has been reverted, so keep but expand this stub, but not because of KFP's rationale.  User:Zoe|(talk) 20:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * What I meant was that the rationale for nominating this article for deletion only applied to the vandalized revision. Revision history should always be checked before nominating an article for deletion. --KFP (talk | contribs) 21:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, I really screwed up there. Thank you very much for catching that, I must be really out of it today.Edward Wakelin 00:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Article as nominated is no longer the article on WP. Tonywalton | Talk 10:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a real, encyclopedic species of ant. The unrelated personal attacks that caused the nominator to (erroneously) nominate this were vandalism and should simply have been reverted. Sandstein 12:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, my delete calls were a dumb mistake. Next time I won't edit or read AfD while sleep-deprived. Edward Wakelin 14:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - There are over 200 ant species stubs, most of which simply state "Article name is a species of ant.", along with a taxobox with no additional species-specific information information. Maybe these should be redirected to a List of ant species their genus name, such as Myrmica (which is the main one).--ragesoss 20:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash;Brim 16:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.