Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myron Goldfinger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Myron Goldfinger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Found no sources at all. The book sources are short mentions. PROD declined because "'just a stub' is not a reason for deletion" even though that is not the reason. Beerest 2 talk 14:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. GScholar has some reviews of some of his buildings in Architectural Digest, and lists 24 citations of his 1969 book Villages in the Sun; a brief review of the book's 1993 reprint is here .  His website has a page with copies of a number of articles about his buildings  and other searches turned up commentary here:  (By the way, he is also apparently a noted collector of New Mexico folk art, see .) --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. The subject appears potentially encyclopaedic if better references can be brought to bear. --gilgongo (talk) 00:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I've added his books, some of which are fairly widely held, though reviews are needed. In any event, the criticism of his work in Architechtural Digest is sufficient to meet the requirements for WP:CREATIVE.  DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep with grateful thanks to and his showing that WP:CREATIVE is met. Well done.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.