Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myrrha P. Satow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Myrrha P. Satow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From a brief bit of research, I fear that she may not pass Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Not all of Dr. Satow's scholarship and educational leadership are found using her full name. Consider searching for "Myrrha Satow" and "Myrrha Pammer," the latter being her legal name when she first earned her PhD. I have read Wikipedia's guidelines and am confused as to why Satow doesn't meet the criteria. Mhoffbauer (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi! That's super exciting that you found multiple reliable sources attesting to Satow's notability. Can you please share some of those sources? Then we can improve the article, and hopefully keep the article. Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 06:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete She is caught up in a scandal involving nepotism and excessive CEO pay from tax payer funds. I don't think that alone is enough to Keep per BLP1E, since prior to the scandal there are only a couple trivial news quotes: -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete, essentially because it would be an WP:NPOV violation to keep only the meager positive sources about her now in the article and not mention the negative ones, but the negative ones fail WP:NOTNEWS as there is no evidence that this story has any long-term interest. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.