Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myrtle Avenue station (LIRR Bay Ridge Branch)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bay Ridge Branch. Liz Read! Talk! 19:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Myrtle Avenue station (LIRR Bay Ridge Branch)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable train station. Closed 98 years ago, and there's simply almost no sourcing on this station, because it's unremarkable. This should be redirected to Bay Ridge Branch, but as any sort of redirect would be contested, I'm bringing this to AfD. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and New York. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bay Ridge Branch per Articles for deletion/Kouwenhoven station. There's nothing in the station article worth merging save for the open/close dates, which are already in the branch article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. The only other mentions I find of this station are in old timetables; I haven't found any significant coverage to support a standalone article. Complex / Rational  01:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Honestly, I couldn't find anything about this station other than trivial coverage; I think this was created mainly because the topic could be confused with another station. Epicgenius (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Epicgenius is correct, as there was a second station at a different location on Myrtle Avenue. Of note with this station, it would be rebuilt if the Triboro RX or Interboro Express is ever built. Obviously, I’d like to see the article not be deleted. Thanks for reading. —SkipperRipper (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per others and also because the creator's defence in making the article is not cogent. We cannot simply assume the station will be rebuilt to the point that it becomes notable enough for an article, nor is multiple things having the same name a good reason to create articles. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.