Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myspace U.S. politics forum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Myspace U.S. politics forum
Okay, here's a weird one. Basically, this is about a subforum of a website, which does not (IMHO) fulfill any sort of notability criteria (let alone WP:WEB) - and the article contents probably would warrant a complete rewrite in any case, in which case Deleting won't hurt. The more odd thing is that I bring this to AfD: I deleted this already, but thought I was kinda-sorta stretching CSD A7, because this is a web forum and not a group of people; however, while a witty philosopher might lump them to same group, the practice is still highly controversial (I'm not saying yea or nay on that myself). I figured that CSD is for uncontroversial stuff and I can't decide myself, it won't hurt to AfD. So here it is up for evaluation, for the sake of the Process. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly not even notable in the context of Myspace itself, fails a quasi-WP:WEB test. Looks like WP:SPAM for the group. Everyone adding advertising for their favorite Myspace forum is not the goal of Wikipedia, I think. -- Kinu t /c  20:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Kill it with fire. (per Kinu) NeoFreak 20:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 21:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete MySpace is a very notable website, but that doesn't mean all its groups or subforums should have their own encyclopedia articles. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Starblind's inherent notability reasoning. Tracker/TTV (myTalk|myWork|myInbox) 00:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.