Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mysterious Burial Site of Mahsuri in Phuket (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 00:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Mysterious Burial Site of Mahsuri in Phuket
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks any resource nor attempt at notability on its own. AfD was already removed by article creator once. Reason given for that: "The article provides insufficient context for lay readers to understand what it is about.", and one reply given that we already have similar content. I'm not inclined to disagree and I'm mostly responding to the unreasonable discussion removal. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 08:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I suppose this is technically a second nomination because the article's primary contributor deleted the AfD tag earlier this evening, but I have a feeling someone is going to want to merge them. Sorry for any confusion. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 08:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. All the coverage we need is already in the article on Mahsuri. --Paularblaster (talk) 08:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment When an AfD tag is removed, the procedure is to restore it, not start a second nomination, that's why Template:Uw-afd exists. Only prod tags can be contested like that, if the user wanted to defend the article they should have gone to the AfD. BlazerKnight (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Need clarification--I know this now but was not certain. This is why I noted it at the top if it could be fixed and I did leave a warning... I just hadn't run into this before. If there are any move removals what would suggestion be then? I can only think of RAA or, I'd hit 3RR problems. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 16:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. As noted by Paularblaster above, the relevant content is already in Mahsuri. This article simply retells the story in a non-encyclopedic format. --RL0919 (talk) 21:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.