Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myth (computer game) development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 07:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Myth (computer game) development

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. All articles must be referenced using reliable/reputable sources and correctly cited and must pass notability guidelines for software (furthermore, this article is about the game's development, not the game itself). Article had a prod tag which was removed without explanation. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 16:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - original research. Shalom Hello 01:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete extremely fascinating and untypical entry in the annals of computer game development; however, regrettably it's definitely not the kind of document Wikipedia is looking for. Could be summarised, briefly, in Myth (computer game) if there were actually good sources for this. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep development articles are common around here, and are considered notable and relevant. By the way, WP:SOFT has nothing to do with notability ;)  Giggy  UCP 04:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I fixed the nomination.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 12:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete Already discussed in adequate depth at Myth (computer game series) JulesH 07:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete while a notable game series, this content is mega-trivial and unencyclopedic. Sample line: "Meanwhile, Project Magma worked on Myth II v1.3.2 (March 14th 2003) allowing Myth II to run natively on Mac OS X, then the ambitious v1.4, v1.4.1 and v1.4.3 (June 14th, August 7th, August 30th)" Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.