Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myth (streamer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that at least some of the additional sources are suitable (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 11:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Myth (streamer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources are available on this guy to show his notability. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO John from Idegon (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Alpha3031 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Alpha3031 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep - significant mentions in quite a few RS:      , center of an article by Forbes:  (and a Daily Mail article - which is prominent but not considered RS: ), as well as numerous mentions in questionably notable websites that are either smaller or focused around Fortnite:       , etc. Additionally, if you consider esports to be sports, he's fairly prominent in that, being the captain of the team of a fairly prominent group. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 21:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant coverage in Forbes and ESPN, and referenced on Polygon . Just shy of 4m followers on Twitch certainly suggests some notability. Badly sourced article rather than non-notable figure, I think. I'll take some time to work in those references tomorrow. Mattyjohn (talk) 23:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep feels like the best coverage of the bunch. The rest seems to put in him a group with others (or even just mention him in passing as compared to Ninja). However the repeated grouping of him as a top person by RS was enough to put in in as a week keep.I put no stock in number of Twitch followers as an indication of notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Noting that he now appears to be the second most followed streamer on Twitch.tv, as of 48 hours ago.Mattyjohn (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.