Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myths about eugenics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   close per WP:SNOW, silly rambling.  Sandstein  19:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Myths about eugenics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Aside from promoting an agenda, I see no reason why this article should exist. The relevant, sourced facts belong in the Eugenics article, and what constitutes a "myth" in this context is highly subjective anyway. Mycroft7 (talk) 15:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

*Delete no referencesChikwangwa (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC) !vote from banned user struck The Evil Spartan (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article claims that feminism is new type of eugenic, which is a clear sign of the intent behind this article, and it does not appear to be neutrality. And the whole "myth/truth" format is not encyclopedia related. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The articles claimed points are perhaps better raised on the Eugenics page. Article is also highly offensive, I might go as far as to suggest that the article was written in anger. Clearly the article needs to be rewritten, but given the offensive remarks, I think it prudent to delete with out much further delay. Yours Czar Brodie (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If there were sources for an old-fashioned myth/fact type of speech, it might be different. I agree with Czar that this does seem pretty emotional. Mandsford (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to eugenics. Hopelessly POV topic, lack of sources, the list goes on... -- Explodicle (T/C) 18:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NN Dreamspy (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, POV fork, and FAQ list. WillOakland (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant WP:NOR violation. Single source does not even support all of the rambling. LonelyBeacon (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.