Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyungEun (Kim Myung-soo and Son Na-eun)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

MyungEun (Kim Myung-soo and Son Na-eun)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:GNG, no claim to notability and no reliable sources to support. I ship deleting this --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't see any possibility of salvaging this article. The subject (a portmanteau of two subjects) is a fictional construct that is not notable in and of itself.  The only Google search results lead to fanfiction pages and similar. Chrisw80 (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: This is effectively a unreferenced BLP which on to itself is grounds for deletion through the WP:BLPPROD. This article is about a relationship which does not prove why the relationship is notable enough to have its own article, basically it is a content fork without enough support for its inclusion. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: not notable. ubiquity (talk) 03:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - spectacularly non-notable ukexpat (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is quite obviously not yet a solid encyclopedia article and also not satisfying the notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  07:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. No evidence of notability, and according to this request, little prospect of finding any. Also, it's unclear what the article is about – a ship? a person? a group of people? a fictitious person? Maproom (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Purely WP:PROMO. No independent suggestion of notability. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  12:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment In any case I'm going to request that someone who knows the language can shed some light as to the notability of the subject.--Prisencolin (talk) 10:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Selective merge into L (South Korean singer) I'm not getting a whole after doing to search of this online but I guess some of the information on the page might be salvageable--Prisencolin (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fancruft at its finest. Like most "ships" in the world of K-pop, everything derives from speculation based on the fact that the two have interacted at one point in their career, though that's not necessarily a requirement. Entirely unencyclopedic. — ξ xplicit  01:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.