Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Náttfari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep per WP:SK. The nomination does not present a guideline- or policy-based rationale for deletion, no delete !votes are present, and commentary herein asserts that the topic is notable. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 09:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Náttfari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources have ever been added in the 5 years that this page has been up. Unless someone can source this, it looks bogus. Pollenatedweasel (talk) 21:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 13.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 22:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - AFD isn't used for "clean up solutions", WP:FIXIT. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: while the nominator isn't merely asking that the article be cleaned up, but is actually doubting its authenticity, WP:BEFORE applies; the legend of Náttfari appears in hundreds of source after one Google search (for an accessible source, see this 1911 book). הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 23:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes notability guidelines by a long chalk. I have added one reference but there are many more out there. The nom should remember that the requirement is not that sources are cited in the article, only that they exist. Philg88 ♦talk 05:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely passes WP:GNG by a long chalk per Philg88. SW3 5DL (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.